Monday, December 20, 2010

Reprinted school officials, regardless of scandals difficult to curb corruption in the research of academic fraud

 Xinhua Home>> Online Assessment>> User Lively
Source: Xinhua
Zhou Shijun Collection
of now, the academic scandals, the proliferation of fake academic, academic corruption is decadent to the universally condemned the 10 February at risk .3 ; two sessions, official position, a lug of academic titles, other countries, academic misconduct or academic corruption, it is only confined to the academic community within the academic field could be corruption in China, but often with corruption in political and economic fields in close combination with each other grounds, even the same strain. and ; official position linked to official corruption will inevitably spread to the academic field of homeopathy, and even in real life, and mutually reinforce each other cover the formation of a Official Body their academic status, in addition to cosmetic and fraud, there are shortcuts to do what?
Indeed, even academic and official circles that we can not completely isolated as an be clearly distinguished, interfere with each other, but each other in order to prevent bureaucratic and academic production bed, dependent on the freedom and innovation. there is an anecdote that year Chiang Kai-shek came to power soon, in order to enhance its own prestige, they want to at the time many of Anhui University of inspection and is Liuwen Dian, Liu Quedui Chiang's ; the grand and warm scene. In this regard, Liu Wendian says, can imagine.
Moreover, the School officials voice of the eunuch and the heel. Thus, leadership speaker, by his argument. so, scholars, independent personality and free critical spirit away castrated men, and how not ?
Xinhua Home>> News Center>> China News
denounced the official standard of scientific research system, Zhou Guangzhao: official would not engage in scientific research
www.XINHUANET.com 2005 年 08 月 22, 09 : 42:37 Source: China Youth Daily
certainly not achieve anything. scientists and scientists are keen on the current phenomenon of the officials very unhappy, they said research system, level, the level, section level, and so the treatment, it is worth noting that even some units currently in the treatment of the so-called cf is empty. to the relevant treatment, resulting in a long right hand, scientists can not be honored titles should be high but also the strange phenomenon of the treatment. leaders are happy to those who have accomplished scientific and technical personnel appointed to the rank of large and small, it seems that only the official closure of the scientists in order to reflect recognition of the achievements and learning.
Zhou Guangzhao official on the phenomenon of science and technology workers were keen to severely criticized. He pointed out that in the work and the official are two totally different values, these two values is difficult at the same time embodied in a person. Some scientists have leadership can go to an official, but an official on the premise that good service must be a scientific workers , since the official would not engage in scientific research, wants to engage in scientific research is not going to an official. But there are many people both official and carry out scientific research, an official good service is not for everyone, but to use his position to stay in a lot of research funding where the graduate school in their own, tend to make people do not really engage in scientific research funding, has seriously affected the development of scientific research. to the Xinjiang Shihezi University after teaching 40 years from Professor Cao Lianpu recommendations at all levels of government should be as little as possible to the scientific workers the burden of administrative work pressure, to create a harmonious environment for them to concentrate on technological innovation. scholarship talent can do administrative work, not all scientists are willing to do administrative work, inappropriate appointments, a waste of talent. Channel>> Technology News
really that many br> Now, large and small research project proposals, the target almost all Lianzutaolun technology in the CPPCC, China Research Institute of Atomic Energy, Zhao Zhixiang members asked, there really so many ;
br> unrealistic pursuit of high-index side, one side must not be allowed to fail. Zhao Zhixiang that such a strange request, so that the project application of the pure high into a deep learning.
to consider whether it is technically mature, there is no risk, so the results can be expected to get anything. the project is to be expected, to be original thing? so the first instance, and many original ideas to be killed out. study. 6 years Hou Haen and Strassmann discovered nuclear fission induced by neutrons, to 1942 in the United States into the first atomic reactor, which is but a short span of 10 years, Chadwick would not have thought, his findings will With such a large application. identified, it should be through in a scientific journal published in peer recognition at home and abroad, including practice tests, including tests such a process.
create a sensational effect. This set back into practice now, and who do so will not be considered pioneering spirit, not with the times. ; statement identification of specialized households, where there are identified if they requested, and must sign papers.
that all items of the assessment should be employed by the major department, the report sent to experts for a week in advance to hold the respondent will be reviewed, not at the conclusion of the review as a unified, review comments made by the experts to prevent the incorrect assessment wind.
encourage innovation, the system failed policy environment of tolerance, inquiry, respect for the human environment of innovation, but not lost a strict, rigorous, serious, rigorous scientific tradition. to pile up. The so baked
2006 年 05 月 15 日 15:10:12 Source: Wang Newsweek
Week . layer check it? Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Professor Wang point out that, these experts reviewed a mere formality, all say good things. For example, he said: project. I was head of the Vetting Committee, they want me to be his project to reach the international advanced. I think I can not sign, the other begging that if the project does not sign the international advanced level projects are rated according to the International l practice r advanced, there can be no development of the project. I was really embarrassed to sign it down. After experiencing such a thing I do not go. but I am not someone to go in the circle of people we all know what a good talk, Who is not talking. projects, including their own assessment of the project also have been someone. If too seriously, or their own bad luck. heard the expert appraisal scenario: then make a major breakthrough, fill in the blanks such comments, write l identified group of experts agreed that the project's technical appraisal by r sentence conclusion, the last air out of experts to the signature. and the acceptance of conclusions, and we prepared the first draft is almost no difference. l you help me to sign a name on the line r. leaders do, what led me to find people, certainly have packed a good relationship, and win greeted. Some experts was difficult at first close, then we do not find him he was not happy. Some of my phone call very excited , said, l can not hear your voice for a long time, and you are not to forget me? r corruption, corruption will destroy the country through science academic
dream 2001-08-27
】 【e acts like the plague of corruption as pervasive, even the pure academic halls were not spared. academic corruption is not uncommon, has long been common at all institutions of higher learning and scientific research institutions.
social sciences academic corruption deputies have proposed and are discussed on the Internet, and natural sciences and corruption are rarely mentioned, do not know why, is not engaged in the social sciences who do not understand, or unwilling to engage in face of natural science, or real people who engaged in natural sciences the ratio of the total population, not too little attention? In short, not very clear what is the reason . but definitely not natural science in academic corruption is not serious.
since the founding of New China, China's technological level is very low, based on the difference is obvious. academic exchanges with the outside world is almost isolated, and the only exchange channels to the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, but also in middle sixties broken. in such difficult conditions, our scientific and technological workers to perseverance, excluding continuous interference of the political movement to create the world would breathtaking accomplishments, such as bombs and one satellite, synthetic insulin, the average life expectancy increased from thirty-year-old sixties and so on. With the country's reform and opening spring breeze blowing through the earth, dry earth science but also to the moisture of the rain shower major achievement, but take no concrete proof. The successful launch of Shenzhou it should be counted, can be the key technology of Shenzhou In the early seventies had learned, the achievements you can count now?
nearly two decades especially in the last decade, we have done in the field of scientific research in what? the ask ourselves a!
reform and opening up the number of professors in colleges and universities? Institute in the number of researchers is higher? now casually in a university median about, the number of professors can and internationally than the number of top universities. But the outcome is thousands of miles apart. Take the most popular indicator is the number of SCI papers included in it, is the largest number of published Nanjing University, more than five articles per year, while the same non-English speaking countries in Asia, University of Tokyo, Japan more than forty thousand articles per year, the gap is large to imagine. This situation has the audacity to say that many universities to create world-class university. I can not help but think of television advertisements broadcast over and over again: shake the world leader, is the level of our grandiose! China's top university professor is too easy when, as long as enough in a mixed position, seniority, number of years in office has published several papers, not committed any politically wrong professorship Wenna. first-class university that, not to mention the other agencies. so low, conditions are lower than the how to do? Latin American relations through the back door can get, if mixed with the last official post to a not strenuous, and the above will be gifts. is not to say there are indicators of title restrictions? it easy to handle, those tubes he has real ability of the nerd, does not find a reason to get down on the line. In order not to get down by others, two points need to focus on academic , the eighth of the focus on interpersonal relationships, if you focus on nine points better grasp on human relationships. titles are representative of the academic level, but in fact something quite different with the academic level. Peking University professor writing a strive to prove the scientific nature of qigong, citing a large number of examples, but these instances are the basic experimental psychology has long studied before. the content of psychology in the back door to qigong, but also with Chinese characteristics, be it! Beijing University Psychology China is greatly famous in their own words if you do not, your problems are not very troublesome thing, as in a school ah. so little learning is not willing to ask for advice to others who can be a professor at prestigious Peking University, not know how many there are bread where the professor.
below to take the lead in the twenty-first century as an example of biomedical disciplines, specifically describe how China's scientific and technical personnel engaged in scientific research.
engaged in scientific research, first of all have issue of funds. professors to Ph.D. Shuodao title fight, the fight is funding the research. very little research funding in China is basically funded by the state, unlike Western countries, more than half of private investment.'s made a fortune in China wealthy who are busy all day how to enjoy wine on the table club, there is no extra money donated to scientific research. those who are afraid of corruption, donated money to clear the source? no recourse but to rely on the State of . Take the highest level of China National Natural Science Foundation of China for instance, the average intensity of the surface of the project funded more than ten million yuan, the successful rate of about one-tenth. In other words, with senior researchers are free to apply for the money, each research topics on average only about ten million, while the ten applicants, only one can be. major projects can be a million, but it is not a person but a group of people jointly apply. the country each year, the total academic research funding may not add up of over one billion yuan, this amount of money equivalent to the U.S. only an ordinary year, funds for scientific research institute in China, but by the hundreds of units to be assessed. had not many researchers, as well as nine out of ten people no subject matter can not do. something people doing too little money, had to think of ways to minimize the greatest return on investment.
specific people to work in the first line is basically a graduate student, the general term for three years to learn , in addition to the extra-curricular, for research on the time at most two years. so little time, so little funding, research available Stop and think. can not vote much,UGG boots, not enough money; can not vote so cutting edge, on the Results not sure; can not vote and teachers did not like, have to live. in violation of the previous one which can not graduate, will not get a degree, three years of struggling white. The best teacher designated by the subject, save a thankless task. As a graduate of the subject is basically on the basis people in foreign countries with minor changes are made, 依葫芦画瓢 to do so. renowned physicist Nobel laureate Dr. Yang Zhenning said: insisted he had the Nobel Prize, but innovation. for themselves, but also for the future of the students as to ah. innovation, means that our predecessors have not done, its findings are difficult to predict. are likely to be successful, they may fail, the possibility of failure is often greater than the probability of success . money, no result, how to write papers, how scientific research report, assessing how titles, the most terrible is how graduate students, students not only ruin the future of his face is also not afford to lose Yeah. In the final analysis a word: innovation , talk to, really do, who would?
even according to the findings of foreign 依葫芦画瓢, due to experimental conditions are different, the results may not appear the case. Do not worry, means living to, this really reflect the intelligence, when the Chinese people. the result is not satisfactory and it has slightly modified the data, charts, slightly modified; picture how to do, use photoshop Yes; illuminate the picture at a glance can not use, modification does not work, how to do? do students have to make similar, with the best, no? also do not worry, scanned from foreign magazines, the best copy and paste from the electronic version over again transplant modification, does not become you! experiments are a failure, simply can not make the expected results, it better to do, to find a similar study of foreign papers, changing the pattern, especially a large copy copy. out of the year tabloid newspaper copy, newspaper copy beam efficiency spirit, what can be cooked masterpiece came out. The method can also be recommended for those who graduate in the name of Jie Du, dry single-minded dedication to make money or things of students abroad, as long as hidden from instructors. If I really do not have time to earn money , can spend money asking the students to do the job. However, before the defense can get the paper learn it and look at the references in order to avoid the flaws.
these phenomena are rare eighties, into ninety Since Wei has become a trend of gradually. is not close to the twentieth century, we began to worry, and people become impulsive it? said the phenomenon of corruption and money on the synchronization, it is not that people have not found corruption is a of a virus infection, transmitted from the bureaucratic to the universities and research institutions?
academic corruption that eradicate it! this continues, follow international picked up the pace, playing with a number of style and no substance, like wax waving silver tips, is always obtained bullied!
also academic piece of pure land it! do not get down to scientific research, not innovation, could make significant technological achievements it? then is how to create bombs and one satellite? never be copied abroad, because others now are strictly confidential and not want to copy are copied. in the biomedical field also created brilliant achievements, such as prevention and treatment of the sixties and seventies to create a variety of toxic drugs, is still a leading position, but not how to promote, Most people do not know. current scientific and technological achievements, is down to earth scientists of the older generation continue to innovate and to overcome the technical difficulties created one. No fame, no matter the temptation of money, with the wholehearted contribution to serve the motherland out of blood! Now many temptations and the heart is floating, and there are a few people are willing to sacrifice it obscure! look at our cutting-edge military research departments are now young men, diverted the diverted, the sea the sea, to go abroad to go abroad, how many apply their knowledge persist in their position? because the technology in these sectors, foreign strictly confidential and is impossible to opportunistic, only pragmatic and innovative, and repeated experiments can be achieved. the relationship of confidentiality, research papers not published, the results can not be propaganda, appropriate honor, not status, remain at their posts were others as fools joke. However, the real research, science and technology is the backbone of the motherland ah! Chinese people can stand straight to the root by science and technology backbone of the support!
Xinhuanet Home>> Technology Channel>> General News
at 13:51:06 Source: Newsweek
hope the parties concerned by the recent incidents of scientific fraud, damage the image of the country, causing huge loss of state-owned science and technology resources. to accept the said that in China similar serious deficiencies in certain institutional and opened the door for them. On the surface, the academic research and scientific fraud is the thing, but behind these events tend to have the competent administrative departments and agencies improper shadow.
; a prosperity, a loss for both sides ;, university leaders need to research, the better-known scholars, this is his performance. Therefore, some university research projects and research personnel is difficult to conduct effective review.
Tangan Guo said: environment in a flippancy. schools to rankings, to the comprehensive strength rating, the first scientific research, have well-known scholars. university leaders as long as that ranking fell, my heart is very anxious, certainly could not sleep at night. For example: to fraud. In this way, school leaders, researchers, and his subordinates, a prosperity, a loss for both sides. they have a common interest: you out of the results, school glory, leading a performance; if you have problems to fall fall . this time, the leaders of the shield, if not intentionally false, or it may tolerate fraud, may not conduct a serious investigation, open eyes closed eyes. is more difficult to discover the problem. Tangan Guo said that this is the , banks like to lend to large enterprises, because trust is high, the small probability of bad debts. Therefore, scientific research will have a , no one has to think too much can cause appears counterfeiters what kind of consequences. Meanwhile, the host of universities, research institutions also experts themselves are being deceived, and their identification of the conclusions it becomes a the leader is due to the impetuous enthusiasm. National Science and Technology Innovation hard from top to bottom, this has its internal mechanism, worry not, it should be a matter of course. In the whole society flippancy, the administrative intervention and the urgent desire of society to the researchers put a lot of pressure, fraud is often the result in this case. < br> Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology, Tongji University, Professor Wang said the first 20 years ago, Britain had a university president to visit China, he said: Landslide, . At present, the real love of science who focus on research done was hard to find people floating in the level most are not seriously engaged in science, are engaged in activities. state investment money to go smoke a lot of bubbles, the bubble had some broken, turned out to be empty. This phenomenon will harm a generation.
VLSI Research Institute of Tongji University, Professor Lin Zhenghui, said: trees, houses have money. Therefore, schools have an incentive to fight for their own project funding. the money directly to the school financing, school to take the number of, the research group to take the number, there are relevant provisions. it may lead to the neglect of the objective evaluation of project results.
Monopoly Administration huge part of the black hole of research funding as an annual session of the seventy
old scientist, first and Lin Zheng-Hui Wang told reporters have now, some huge approval of funding for scientific research and technology to master a few do not understand the hands of administrative officials, who with robust power, resulting in the abuse of power, property rights from government departments to withdraw approval of direct scientific research projects, scientific research fund system and the establishment of just and fair and open system of expert review, the only way the national long-term development plan of science and technology can be successfully achieved.
Wang said first , a number of large projects on the billion to the Secretary, the Director are governing, a Director can manage hundreds of millions of money. each should have a high Xiaokeyanchu PR, is the truth. He said: counted once and the Ministry of Science and led a project account, the state how much, how many are wasted, say under his leadership the Department of pipe. can be seen, the power in the l imp r there. Examples: . We are calling for: those who can not let the Director, Division were wealthy; have to set up a fund to be set up a fund for each project. Standing Committee should review each of a large project to manage, as I study the ocean exploration, such a large project management in the United States belongs to the Congress. If the money, particularly if necessary to set up a special group. impossible.
Zheng-Hui Lin said, colleges and universities in the popular saying support, the school introduced. of money in some ministries, departments hold responsible for the hands, but also for their counterparts in the departments of the business to help you speak, open up the experts and the leaders. For example, in recent years, some so-called .
wary of taking the national research funding money laundering, bribery
Zheng-Hui Lin told reporters after the state issued 到账 research funding, be sure to follow the trend of account, because some of the counterfeiters will be all sorts of excuses to draw the money of their own companies abroad name.
national research funding for some time before being transferred abroad suspected of allocated 7 million yuan, only 500 million purchase of equipment, large sums of kickbacks into the coffers; second, bulk purchase of gas ...

No comments:

Post a Comment